browsers.to

Comparison

Mozilla Firefox vs LibreWolf in 2026

Compare Firefox and LibreWolf in 2026. Mozilla's original vs the privacy-hardened fork with no telemetry, uBlock Origin pre-installed, and strict defaults.

LibreWolf is Firefox with the compromises removed. It is a fork that takes Mozilla's browser, strips out telemetry, sponsored content and the studies system, disables the parts that phone home, and ships with privacy settings turned up to where a cautious user would put them anyway. If you have ever gone through Firefox's config layer hardening it by hand, LibreWolf is roughly the result, maintained for you.

What hardening actually buys you

That produces the one clear rating difference between them: LibreWolf scores 5 for privacy, Firefox 4. LibreWolf enables uBlock Origin by default, includes stronger fingerprinting resistance, clears cookies and history on close unless you change it, and strips URL tracking parameters from links. Firefox blocks trackers and fingerprinting out of the box, which is genuinely good, but it also ships a search deal, occasional sponsored tiles on the new tab page, and telemetry that is on unless you turn it off.

Sync, mobile and daily friction

What you give up is convenience, and the biggest item is sync. Firefox Sync carries your bookmarks, history, passwords and open tabs across desktop and mobile, encrypted end to end. LibreWolf has no sync at all. It also has no mobile build — Mac, Windows and Linux only — so if your phone is part of how you browse, LibreWolf cannot be your only browser. Firefox runs on all five major platforms.

The hardened defaults also break things. Clearing cookies on exit means logging back into everything. Strict fingerprinting resistance can make sites behave oddly, and some will fail outright until you relax a setting. This is why LibreWolf scores 3 for ease of use against Firefox's 4 — the friction is the point, but it is still friction.

Updates are a smaller consideration: LibreWolf tracks Firefox releases closely but not instantly, so security patches can arrive slightly later.

Which should you choose?

Choose Firefox if you want strong privacy with a browser that still behaves conveniently — sync across your phone and laptop, sensible session handling, and settings you can harden yourself when you want to. For the large majority of people this is the right answer.

Choose LibreWolf if you want Firefox with no telemetry, no sponsored content and no search deals, you browse on desktop only, and you would rather re-authenticate to sites than leave cookies lying around. It is not a different browser so much as a different set of opinions about the defaults — and if you already spend time hardening Firefox manually, it saves you the work and does it more thoroughly.

Mozilla Firefox logo

Mozilla Firefox

Mac
Windows
Linux
iOS
Android

Open-source with strong privacy features and advanced customization.

LibreWolf logo

LibreWolf

Mac
Windows
Linux

Privacy- and security-focused Firefox fork with sane defaults.

Ratings

Speed

Mozilla Firefox4/5
4/5LibreWolf

Ease of use

Mozilla Firefox4/5
3/5LibreWolf

Customizability

Mozilla Firefox5/5
4/5LibreWolf

Privacy

Mozilla Firefox4/5
5/5LibreWolf

Extensions

Mozilla Firefox5/5
4/5LibreWolf

AI features

Mozilla Firefox2/5
1/5LibreWolf

Features

Mozilla FirefoxLibreWolf
Private search engine default
Private AI chat
Blocks 3rd-party trackers
Blocks targeted ads
Blocks cookie consent pop-ups
Blocks targeted ads on YouTube
Built-in password manager
Blocks email spy pixels
One-tap history clearing
Data broker removal service
Identity theft restoration
Built-in VPN
Workspaces / Tab groups
Split screen view
Vertical tabs support
Anti-fingerprinting protection
Native ad blocker
Supports Chrome/Firefox extensions
Syncs across devices
Distraction-free reader mode
Tor network integration

Related comparisons

More head-to-head matchups

Explore other comparisons involving Mozilla Firefox or LibreWolf.